Q&As

'Consequential Loss: It's all in the definition'

Friday October 17, 2014

The below article from 23 May 2014 has been provided by Scott Alden, Partner and Philippa Hinton, Solicitor, DLA Piper.

 

Recent Historical Context

Until recently (Environmental Systems Pty Ltd v Peerless Holdings Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 26) it was generally accepted by parties to contracts, and the courts in Australia, that the term 'consequential loss' meant those losses falling under the econd limb of losses described in Hadley v Baxendale ((1854) 9 Exch 341, [354]) and which Lord Alderson B categorised as Indirect Loss (or subjectively foreseeable loss).

 

These Indirect Losses were held to be losses which are not a direct consequence of the breach, and were therefore not fairly and reasonably considered as "arising naturally" or "in the usual course of things", from the breach itself.  As such, "consequential loss" was not found to encompass damages for loss of profits or expenses incurred to remedy a breach of contract as these were considered outside of that definition. 

 

In Peerless, the Victorian Court of Appeal departed from previous English authorities and, in so doing, narrowed the ability of parties to recover certain types of damages under a contract excluding liability for "consequential loss".  

Click here to read more.

 

© 2014. Copyright in this material is retained by the authors.

 

A licence to publish in this format has been granted to Legalwise Seminars Pty Ltd. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of these materials may be reproduced by any process without written permission of the author.

 

Disclaimer

 

The statements, analyses, opinions and conclusions in these materials are those of the author and not of Legalwise Seminars Pty Ltd which acts only in the capacity as convenor of educational courses.

 

No part of any paper can be regarded as legal advice. Although all care has been taken in preparing all papers, readers must not alter their position or refrain from doing so in reliance on any paper. Neither the author nor Legalwise Seminars Pty Ltd accept or undertake any duty of care relating to any part of any paper.

 

All enquiries should be directed to Legalwise Seminars Pty Ltd.

 

Legalwise Seminars Pty Ltd (ABN 40 049 329 749) (ACN 102 742 843)

 

Tags :
Subscribe

"An excellent series of seminars with great relevance to me."

Delegate - Evidence Examined in Criminal Matters, Perth, November 2017

 

 

 

 

 

, Evidence Examined in Criminal Matters

Read more testimonials